Resources/Skill library
SAP Consultant Skill Library
Your assistant knows SAP in general. It does not know your program.
Ask a generic model for a WRICEF spec and you get a plausible template. Ask it for a cutover plan and you get a checklist that has never survived a go-live weekend. The gap is not intelligence — it is instruction.
This library closes it. 92 skills, each one a written procedure for a task an SAP professional actually gets paid to do.
I built these skills because I needed them myself. As a freelance SAP consultant, I use them every week to turn meeting notes into RAID logs, draft WRICEF specs, build cutover plans, and sanity-check claims before I send them to a client. They were born from real project pressure, not from a prompt-engineering playbook.
What is inside
20 role folders. PMO, Program Director, Solution Architect, Functional Consultant, Technical Consultant, Basis, Authorizations, Cutover Manager, Data Migration Lead, Test Manager, Incident Manager, Service Delivery Manager, Team Lead AMS, Support Functional, and the maintenance variants of each.
Each folder stands alone. Roles share some skills on purpose — a Basis consultant and a Basis maintenance consultant both need the health check. Take the folder that matches your job, ignore the rest, or you can implement them all and let AI uses the right skill for your task. (This is what I do).
Every skill is a procedure, not a prompt. Required inputs, preflight checks, workflow, output format, and the failure modes that produced the rules. If the input is missing, the skill says so instead of hallucinating a table name.
A sample of what they do
- raid-log-updater — turns meeting notes into a deduplicated RAID log with a delta summary you can paste into a status report
- wricef-spec-writer — functional requirement in, developer-ready specification out
- sod-conflict-analyzer — segregation-of-duties conflicts, ranked, with remediation options
- cutover-plan-builder — task-level plan with dependencies, owners and rollback points
- migration-reconciliation-checker — proves the load actually matched the source
- postmortem-writer — a blameless postmortem that stands up in front of the client
- sap-source-verifier — checks an uncertain SAP claim against notes, docs and community, and says honestly what each source proves
Who this is for
Consultants who are tired of rewriting the same deliverable in a different client's template. Team leads who want their juniors producing at senior quality. Freelancers billing by the day who would rather spend it on the problem than the paperwork.
ROI: paid back in days
Pick the folder that matches your role and implement the skills you use every week. Each one removes the blank-page delay, the back-and-forth with a generic model, and the cleanup of hallucinated SAP details. The time saved is usually several hours per month — which means the $199 investment pays for itself within the first few days of the month.
What you get
A single download: 92 skill folders in editable Markdown, plus a client-context template and an index. Instant access after payment. One-time $199, no subscription, yours to adapt.
What's inside
- 92 skills across 20 role folders — each one self-contained, drop it in and it works
- Written from ten years in the SAP ecosystem, not scraped from documentation
- Every skill states its required inputs and refuses to invent what it does not have
- Deliverable-oriented: RAID logs, WRICEF specs, cutover plans, SoD analyses, postmortems, SteerCo decks
- Bilingual by design — the output follows your language, SAP identifiers stay intact
- Editable Markdown, no lock-in, works with Claude, ChatGPT or any assistant that reads skill files
Who it's for
SAP consultants, project managers, architects and AMS teams who want their AI assistant to produce high quality responses and documentations faster than any default LLM answer.
See the difference
Same request. One with the skill, one without.
Both documents answer the same functional requirement — a cost center category restriction. The one written with the skill is clearer, more detailed, and follows the client's own specification template. Download both and compare.
With the skill
FSD — Cost Center Category Restriction
Client template respected, complete sections, explicit assumptions, test cases and developer-ready detail.
Download the .docx →Without the skill
FS — Cost Center Category Restriction
A plausible generic answer: shorter, looser structure, no client template, gaps a developer would have to come back and ask about.
Download the .docx →Need something tailored to your organisation?
These resources are general-purpose by design. If your situation needs a custom diagnostic, scorecard, or roadmap, that's a conversation.
Discuss a custom engagement →